Clostridium difficile Toxin/GDH With Reflex to PCR

Clostridium difficile Toxin/GDH With Reflex to PCR

This test is used to diagnose C difficile infection in symptomatic patients.

Clostridium difficile Toxin/GDH with Reflex to PCR

Test Summary

 

Clostridium difficile Toxin/GDH With Reflex to PCR

Test code: 91664

 

Clinical use

  • Diagnose Clostridium difficile infection in symptomatic patients

Clinical background

C difficile (genus recently reclassified to Clostridioides1,2) is an opportunistic, toxin-producing bacterial pathogen of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. As the most common cause of healthcare-acquired infection and hospital-acquired diarrhea in the United States,3 C difficile places substantial burden on the healthcare system, causing nearly half a million infections and contributing to over 20,000 deaths annually.4 Although the incidence of healthcare-acquired C difficile infection has decreased over the past decade, the incidence of community-acquired infection has increased,5 and C difficile remains an urgent public health threat.6

C difficile commonly colonizes the GI tract of healthy individuals (5% of adults and 15% to 70% of infants7). It becomes problematic when antibiotic therapy alters the intestinal flora, facilitating its proliferation.7 C difficile infection can result in GI problems ranging from mild diarrhea to life-threatening fulminant colitis.7

Disease-causing C difficile produces toxins (A and/or B) that cause the destruction of intestinal epithelial cells.7 A C difficile strain called ribotype 027/NAP1/BI, which emerged in the early 2000s, expresses a variant of toxin B that makes the strain more virulent than those previously identified.7 Toxins are detected by immunoassay, which has high specificity (99%) but relatively low sensitivity (57% to 83%).2,3

C difficile also produces a large amount of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH). Diagnostic tests that detect GDH are therefore highly sensitive for C difficile (94% to 96%).2,3 However, because GDH is produced by toxigenic and non-toxigenic C difficile strains, these tests have low specificity for disease-causing C difficile.2,3

Because no single test has the combined sensitivity and specificity required to unambiguously identify disease-causing C difficile,2,3 guidelines recommend a multistep testing algorithm: toxin A and B testing combined with GDH testing and/or toxin gene testing (using nucleic acid amplification tests such as polymerase chain reaction [PCR] assays).2,3,8

Quest Diagnostics offers the Clostridium difficile Toxin/GDH With Reflex to PCR test (test code 91664), an immunoassay that simultaneously detects toxins A and B and GDH and reflexes to real-time PCR targeting the C difficile toxin B gene (tcdB) if results are discordant.

Individuals suitable for testing

  • Individuals with unexplained unformed stool
  • Individuals with suspected ileus due to C difficile infection

Testing is not recommended for infants <1 year old.3 Testing for cure is discouraged,2,3 as is repeat testing, except in epidemic settings (eg, in patients with suspected C difficile infection and worsening symptoms).3

Method

  • Immunoassay that simultaneously detects toxins A and B and GDH in a single assay
  • Real-time PCR targeting the C difficile toxin B gene if toxin and GDH results are discordant
  • Analytical sensitivity: 0.63 ng/mL for toxin A, 0.16 ng/mL for toxin B, 0.8 ng/mL for GDH9

Reflex testing is performed at an additional charge.

Interpretive information

Absence of both GDH antigen and toxin is consistent with absence of C difficile infection.

Presence of both GDH antigen and toxin is consistent with C difficile infection in a symptomatic patient.

Presence of either GDH antigen or toxin, coupled with presence of C difficile toxin B gene (ie, positive PCR test), is consistent with C difficile infection in a symptomatic patient.

Presence of GDH antigen and absence of both toxin and C difficile toxin B gene (ie, negative PCR test) is consistent with presence of a non–disease-causing strain of C difficile or another Clostridioides species.

References

  1. Lawson PA, Citron DM, Tyrrell KL, et al. Reclassification of Clostridium difficile as Clostridioides difficile (Hall and O’Toole 1935) Prévot 1938. Anaerobe. 2016;40:95-99. doi:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.06.008
  2. Kelly CR, Fischer M, Allegretti JR, et al. ACG clinical guidelines: prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of Clostridioides difficile infections. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;116(6):1124-1147. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000001278
  3. McDonald LC, Gerding DN, Johnson S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults and children: 2017 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66(7):e1-e48. doi:10.1093/cid/cix1085
  4. Guh AY, Mu Y, Winston LG, et al. Trends in U.S. burden of Clostridioides difficile infection and outcomes. New Engl J Medicine. 2020;382(14):1320-1330. doi:10.1056/nejmoa1910215
  5. Fu Y, Luo Y, Grinspan AM. Epidemiology of community-acquired and recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2021;14:17562848211016248. doi:10.1177/17562848211016248
  6. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019. Revised December 2019. Accessed July 7, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/pdf/threats-report/2019-ar-threats-report-508.pdf. doi:10.15620/cdc:82532
  7. Czepiel J, Dróżdż M, Pituch H, et al. Clostridium difficile infection: review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;38(7):1211-1221. doi:10.1007/s10096-019-03539-6
  8. Kraft CS, Parrott JS, Cornish NE, et al. A laboratory medicine best practices systematic review and meta-analysis of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) and algorithms including NAATs for the diagnosis of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in adults. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019;32(3):e00032-18. doi:10.1128/cmr.00032-18
  9. C. Diff Quik Chek Complete®. Package insert. TECHLAB, Inc; 2021. Accessed June 9, 2023. https://www.techlab.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/C-DIFF-QUIK-CHEK-COMPLETE-PI-91-525-03-TL-_06-2021.pdf

Content reviewed 07/2023

top of page

This test is used to diagnose C difficile infection in symptomatic patients.

Clostridium difficile Toxin/GDH with Reflex to PCR

Test Summary

 

Clostridium difficile Toxin/GDH With Reflex to PCR

Test code: 91664

 

Clinical use

  • Diagnose Clostridium difficile infection in symptomatic patients

Clinical background

C difficile (genus recently reclassified to Clostridioides1,2) is an opportunistic, toxin-producing bacterial pathogen of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. As the most common cause of healthcare-acquired infection and hospital-acquired diarrhea in the United States,3 C difficile places substantial burden on the healthcare system, causing nearly half a million infections and contributing to over 20,000 deaths annually.4 Although the incidence of healthcare-acquired C difficile infection has decreased over the past decade, the incidence of community-acquired infection has increased,5 and C difficile remains an urgent public health threat.6

C difficile commonly colonizes the GI tract of healthy individuals (5% of adults and 15% to 70% of infants7). It becomes problematic when antibiotic therapy alters the intestinal flora, facilitating its proliferation.7 C difficile infection can result in GI problems ranging from mild diarrhea to life-threatening fulminant colitis.7

Disease-causing C difficile produces toxins (A and/or B) that cause the destruction of intestinal epithelial cells.7 A C difficile strain called ribotype 027/NAP1/BI, which emerged in the early 2000s, expresses a variant of toxin B that makes the strain more virulent than those previously identified.7 Toxins are detected by immunoassay, which has high specificity (99%) but relatively low sensitivity (57% to 83%).2,3

C difficile also produces a large amount of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH). Diagnostic tests that detect GDH are therefore highly sensitive for C difficile (94% to 96%).2,3 However, because GDH is produced by toxigenic and non-toxigenic C difficile strains, these tests have low specificity for disease-causing C difficile.2,3

Because no single test has the combined sensitivity and specificity required to unambiguously identify disease-causing C difficile,2,3 guidelines recommend a multistep testing algorithm: toxin A and B testing combined with GDH testing and/or toxin gene testing (using nucleic acid amplification tests such as polymerase chain reaction [PCR] assays).2,3,8

Quest Diagnostics offers the Clostridium difficile Toxin/GDH With Reflex to PCR test (test code 91664), an immunoassay that simultaneously detects toxins A and B and GDH and reflexes to real-time PCR targeting the C difficile toxin B gene (tcdB) if results are discordant.

Individuals suitable for testing

  • Individuals with unexplained unformed stool
  • Individuals with suspected ileus due to C difficile infection

Testing is not recommended for infants <1 year old.3 Testing for cure is discouraged,2,3 as is repeat testing, except in epidemic settings (eg, in patients with suspected C difficile infection and worsening symptoms).3

Method

  • Immunoassay that simultaneously detects toxins A and B and GDH in a single assay
  • Real-time PCR targeting the C difficile toxin B gene if toxin and GDH results are discordant
  • Analytical sensitivity: 0.63 ng/mL for toxin A, 0.16 ng/mL for toxin B, 0.8 ng/mL for GDH9

Reflex testing is performed at an additional charge.

Interpretive information

Absence of both GDH antigen and toxin is consistent with absence of C difficile infection.

Presence of both GDH antigen and toxin is consistent with C difficile infection in a symptomatic patient.

Presence of either GDH antigen or toxin, coupled with presence of C difficile toxin B gene (ie, positive PCR test), is consistent with C difficile infection in a symptomatic patient.

Presence of GDH antigen and absence of both toxin and C difficile toxin B gene (ie, negative PCR test) is consistent with presence of a non–disease-causing strain of C difficile or another Clostridioides species.

References

  1. Lawson PA, Citron DM, Tyrrell KL, et al. Reclassification of Clostridium difficile as Clostridioides difficile (Hall and O’Toole 1935) Prévot 1938. Anaerobe. 2016;40:95-99. doi:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.06.008
  2. Kelly CR, Fischer M, Allegretti JR, et al. ACG clinical guidelines: prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of Clostridioides difficile infections. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;116(6):1124-1147. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000001278
  3. McDonald LC, Gerding DN, Johnson S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults and children: 2017 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66(7):e1-e48. doi:10.1093/cid/cix1085
  4. Guh AY, Mu Y, Winston LG, et al. Trends in U.S. burden of Clostridioides difficile infection and outcomes. New Engl J Medicine. 2020;382(14):1320-1330. doi:10.1056/nejmoa1910215
  5. Fu Y, Luo Y, Grinspan AM. Epidemiology of community-acquired and recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2021;14:17562848211016248. doi:10.1177/17562848211016248
  6. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019. Revised December 2019. Accessed July 7, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/pdf/threats-report/2019-ar-threats-report-508.pdf. doi:10.15620/cdc:82532
  7. Czepiel J, Dróżdż M, Pituch H, et al. Clostridium difficile infection: review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;38(7):1211-1221. doi:10.1007/s10096-019-03539-6
  8. Kraft CS, Parrott JS, Cornish NE, et al. A laboratory medicine best practices systematic review and meta-analysis of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) and algorithms including NAATs for the diagnosis of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in adults. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019;32(3):e00032-18. doi:10.1128/cmr.00032-18
  9. C. Diff Quik Chek Complete®. Package insert. TECHLAB, Inc; 2021. Accessed June 9, 2023. https://www.techlab.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/C-DIFF-QUIK-CHEK-COMPLETE-PI-91-525-03-TL-_06-2021.pdf

Content reviewed 07/2023

top of page

Reference ranges are provided as general guidance only. To interpret test results use the reference range in the laboratory report.

The tests listed by specialty and category are a select group of tests offered. For a complete list of Quest Diagnostics tests, please adjust the filter options chosen, or refer to our Directory of Services.