Lyme Disease: Laboratory Support of Diagnosis and Management
Lyme Disease: Laboratory Support of Diagnosis and Management
This Clinical Focus provides information about laboratory tests related to Lyme disease.
Clinical Focus
Lyme Disease
Laboratory Support of Diagnosis and Management
Clinical background [return to contents]
Lyme disease or Lyme borreliosis is by far the most common tick-borne disease in the United States. It is caused by the bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi and transmitted from the deer tick (Ixodes scapularis or Ixodes pacificus). In 2023, approximately 90,000 cases of Lyme disease were reported to the CDC by healthcare providers1 but, based on insurance claims data, the annual number of patients diagnosed and treated could be as high as 476,000 per year.2
Lyme disease cases are most frequently reported from the upper midwestern, northeastern, and Mid-Atlantic states.3 However, cases are also reported from Northern California, Oregon, and Washington. Lyme disease is most common among children and middle-aged adults.4
The clinical presentation of Lyme disease is categorized as 1 of 3 stages: early localized, early disseminated, and late (Table 1).3,5-7 In 70% to 80% of infected persons, early localized disease is characterized by erythema migrans (EM), a round skin lesion at least 4 cm to 5 cm in diameter that may appear in a “bulls-eye” pattern and expand up to 30 cm across.3 In the absence of EM, the differential diagnosis may include other tick-borne diseases such as hard tick relapsing fever (Borrelia miyamotoi disease), which is often misdiagnosed as Lyme disease owing to overlapping symptoms.8
Table 1. Lyme Disease: Stages, Symptoms, and Recommended Laboratory Testing [return to contents]
Stage of disease3,5 |
Symptom onset3 |
Symptoms3 |
Laboratory testing3,7 |
Early localized |
3-30 days after tick bite |
|
If EM is identified in a patient where Lyme disease is endemic, serologic testing is not recommended (ie, clinical diagnosis of Lyme is recommended) STTT or MTTT may be considered (weakly recommended) for patients with 1 or more skin lesions suggestive of but atypical for EM; however, serologic testing during the acute phase of infection is less sensitive and specific than testing at later stages of infection |
Early disseminated |
3-12 weeks after tick bite |
|
When assessing for possible LNB affecting either the PNS or CNS, STTT or MTTT, serum is recommended If LNB or 1 or more acute symptoms (eg, meningitis, painful radiculoneuritis) of LNB is suspected, guideline recommendations include obtaining simultaneous samples of CSF and serum for measuring CSF:serum antibody index STTT or MTTT is recommended when assessing for rheumatologic symptoms of Lyme disease; PCR is recommended in seropositive patients |
Late-stage |
Months to years after tick bite |
|
STTT or MTTT is recommended with IgG only considered >30 days after symptom onset |
| CNS, central nervous system; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; EM, erythema migrans; LNB, Lyme neuroborreliosis; MTTT, modified 2-tiered testing; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PNS, peripheral nervous system; STTT, standard 2-tiered testing. |
The first sign of early disseminated disease is often additional smaller skin lesions that may develop if Lyme disease is untreated; however, a recognized skin lesion does not always occur. Extracutaneous involvement in early disseminated disease can include cardiac, rheumatologic, and/or neurologic manifestations (Table 1).3,5-7 About 10% to 15% of patients with untreated Lyme disease will develop Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB).9 Lyme arthritis may also occur during late-stage disease and is the most common manifestation of Lyme disease months after initial tick exposure.10 Left untreated, Lyme arthritis usually affects the knees over a period of several years.10
If initiated in the early stages of Lyme disease, treatment with appropriate antibiotics is usually effective.7 Prophylaxis or serologic testing after a tick bite is usually not indicated in areas where less than 20% of ticks are infected; however, in areas where infected ticks are endemic, laboratory testing, including tick identification, is recommended.7
This Clinical Focus provides information on appropriate test selection and interpretation in patients with suspected Lyme disease. The information in the text and tables is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended as medical advice. Test selection and interpretation, diagnosis, and patient management decisions should be based on the physician’s education, clinical expertise, and assessment of the patient.
Individuals suitable for testing [return to contents]
- Symptomatic (Table 1) individuals with a history of exposure to a tick-endemic area
Test availability [return to contents]
Laboratory tests that can help confirm the clinical diagnosis of Lyme disease include tick identification, various serologic techniques and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays (Table 2). Panel components may be ordered individually.
Table 2. Tests Available for Diagnosis and Management of Lyme Disease [return to contents]
Test code |
Assaya |
Method |
Clinical use |
Borrelia burgdorferi DNA, Qualitative Real-Time PCR, Miscellaneousb,c |
Real-time PCR |
Diagnose Lyme disease using whole blood, synovial fluid, or CSF |
|
Borrelia miyamotoi Antibody (IgG, IgM), Immunoassayb |
Immunoassay |
Differentially diagnose B miyamotoi disease vs Lyme disease |
|
Borrelia miyamotoi DNA, Qualitative Real-Time PCR, Miscellaneousb |
Real-time PCR |
Confirm diagnosis of B miyamotoi disease |
|
Borrelia Species DNA, Qualitative Real-Time PCR, Miscellaneousb |
Real-time PCR |
Detect Borrelia spp DNA in whole blood, synovial fluid, or CSF |
|
Borrelia Species DNA, Qualitative Real-Time PCR, Tickb |
Real-time PCR |
Detect B burgdorferi in tick to assess risk of Lyme disease |
|
Borrelia Species DNA, Real-Time PCR, With Reflexes, Bloodc,d |
Real-time PCR |
Detect Borrelia spp DNA; diagnose Lyme disease or B miyamotoi disease in whole blood |
|
Borrelia Species DNA, Real-Time PCR, With Reflexes, Synovial Fluid/CSFc,d |
Real-time PCR |
Detect Borrelia spp DNA; diagnose Lyme disease or B miyamotoi disease in synovial fluid or CSF |
|
Lyme Disease Ab With Reflex to Blot (IgG, IgM)d |
Immunoassay |
Diagnose Lyme disease by standard 2-tiered test |
|
Lyme Disease Antibody With Reflex to Immunoassay (IgG, IgM) (MTTT)d Includes reflex to Lyme disease supplemental antibodies (IgG, IgM) if Lyme disease antibody is positive or equivocal. |
Immunoassay |
Diagnose Lyme disease by modified 2-tiered test |
|
Lyme Disease Antibody Index for CNS Infection |
ELISA; Nephelometry |
Diagnose Lyme neuroborreliosis |
|
Lyme Disease Antibodies (IgG, IgM), Immunoblot |
Immunoblot |
Diagnose Lyme disease when ELISA results are positive or equivocal |
|
Lyme Disease Antibody (IgG), Immunoblot |
|||
Tick-borne Disease, Acute Molecular Panel Includes Anaplasma phagocytophilum (17320), Babesia microti (37314), Borrelia miyamotoi (93795), Ehrlichia chaffeensis (11353), and Lyme disease Borrelia spp (15777). |
Real-time PCR |
Diagnose tick-borne diseases when selecting tests for individual pathogens is challenging owing to overlapping geographic distributions and clinical presentations of illness; especially useful to diagnose mixed infections |
|
Tick-borne Disease, Antibody Panel With Reflexesb,d Includes Lyme disease Ab with reflex to immunoassay (IgG, IgM, 39733) and A phagocytophilum antibodies (IgG and IgM, 16189); B microti antibodies (IgG and IgM, 16194); and E chaffeensis (IgG and IgM, 16197) with reflexes to titers. |
IFA |
Diagnose tick-borne diseases when selecting tests for individual pathogens is challenging owing to substantial clinical overlap and coinfection |
|
Tick ID With Reflex to Lyme Disease DNA, Real-Time PCR, Tickd |
Microscopy; reflex to PCR |
Identify tick and B burgdorferi to assess risk of tick-borne disease and assist with differential diagnosis |
| CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; IFA, immunofluorescence assay; PCR, polymerase chain reaction. | |
| a | Panel components may be ordered individually. |
| b | This test was developed and its analytical performance characteristics have been determined by Quest Diagnostics. It has not been cleared or approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. This assay has been validated pursuant to the CLIA regulations and is used for clinical purposes. |
| c | Please refer to the Quest Test Directory for your service area for test availability. TestDirectory.QuestDiagnostics.com/Test/Home |
| d | Reflex tests are performed at an additional charge and are associated with an additional CPT® code(s). |
Test selection and interpretation [return to contents]
A timeline of tick exposure in a tick-endemic area and symptoms of Lyme disease guide appropriate test selection (Table 1).3,5-7 Guideline recommendations include testing for IgM and/or IgG antibodies using either standard 2-tiered testing (STTT, test code 6646) or modified 2-tiered testing (MTTT, test code 39733)6,7,11; in MTTT, second-tier testing is performed by a second enzyme immunoassay instead of a Western blot. MTTT detects up to 30% more cases compared to STTT in patients with early Lyme disease.12,13 The sections below outline appropriate test selection based on the stage of disease along with characteristic test results.
Early localized Lyme disease
Diagnosis of early localized Lyme disease can sometimes be made on the basis of EM alone without laboratory testing.3 Importantly, serologic testing during the acute phase of Lyme disease is less sensitive than at later stages of disease.6 When testing is done too soon (≤14 days) following infection, negative or equivocal results may occur due to the time needed for the immune system to develop a serologic response.6 Positive or repeat testing (test codes 29477, 8593) on another sample collected in 7 to 14 days is recommened.6 Serologic testing (MTTT or STTT) may also be considered in patients with 1 or more skin lesions suggestive of, but atypical for, EM.7
If first-tier testing performed 14 days after suspected infection is negative, then second-tier testing is not required.6 If first-tier testing is positive or equivocal, then second-tier testing is required.6 For samples collected from patients with symptoms lasting 30 days or less, positive IgM is consistent with infection regardless of IgG seropositivity.6
Early disseminated Lyme disease
Two-tiered testing is recommended when clinical findings are suggestive of early disseminated Lyme disease (Table 1).3,5-7 For specimens collected at 2 to 4 weeks after onset of symptoms, 2-tiered testing that is positive for IgM and negative for IgG indicates early infection, unless obtained on a specimen collected more than 1 month after onset of symptoms.6 If the specimen was collected more than 1 month after onset of symptoms, a positive IgM finding is more likely to represent a false-positive result unless IgG is also positive; vaccination or other diseases may also cause false-positive results.6 A positive IgG result by 2-tiered testing is required to confirm the diagnosis of early disseminated Lyme disease but it does not differentiate between active and past B burgdorferi infection.3,14
A diagnosis of LNB involving either the peripheral nervous system or central nervous system (CNS) can be supported if Borrelia antibody or DNA are detected in serum or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF); however, serum antibody testing is recommended over PCR due to low clinical sensitivity (38%).7,15 If LNB involving the CNS is suspected and CSF testing is performed, a validated laboratory method for the determination of the CSF:serum antibody index using simultaneously obtained CSF and serum samples is recommended.7 The antibody levels in the CSF that are compared to control levels (ie, serum antibody or albumin) in the CSF:serum antibody index can be measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or nephelometry (test code 34194); an elevated antibody index strongly supports a diagnosis of LNB.16
Negative serology results may indicate lack of infection or lack of seroconversion, which may occur if samples are collected too early after disease onset or when early antibiotic therapy blunts the antibody response.6 PCR-based assays (test codes 94322, 39209, 15777, 39219, 39218, 15510, 90558) can be useful in the workup of B burgdorferi infection if seroconversion has not yet occurred; these assays, however, are limited by low clinical sensitivity (18%).17 Untreated patients who continue to be symptomatic for months or years but are IgG-negative are unlikely to have Lyme disease, and a differential diagnosis should be considered.7
Late-stage Lyme disease
In patients with suspected Lyme disease that has been left untreated for months to years after a tick bite, symptoms that are characteristic of late-stage disease such as Lyme arthritis or Lyme LNB can help guide diagnostic test selection. Detection of Borrelia DNA in synovial fluid, commonly from the knees, supports the diagnosis of Lyme arthritis (sensitivity, 78%; specificity, 100%).10,17
Differential diagnosis
In addition to clinical presentation and microscopy, hard-tick relapsing fever (Borrelia miyamotoi disease) (HTRF [BMD]) can be distinguished from Lyme disease by serology (test code 39684) and molecular testing.3 Negative serology results do not rule out HTRF (BMD) infection and may be due to testing prior to seroconversion during the acute phase of infection.18 PCR amplification of B miyamotoi DNA (test code 93795) is part of an acute molecular panel of tests (94322) used to confirm a presumptive diagnosis of HTRF (BMD).
See Tick-borne Diseases: Laboratory Support of Diagnosis and Management for more details on HTRF (BMD) and information on differential diagnoses of other tick-borne diseases.
References [return to contents]
- Lyme disease surveillance data. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated February 11, 2025. Accessed December 15, 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/data-research/facts-stats/surveillance-data-1.html
- Kugeler KJ, Schwartz AM, Delorey MJ, et al. Estimating the frequency of Lyme disease diagnoses, United States, 2010-2018. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021;27(2):616-619. doi:10.3201/eid2702.202731
- Tickborne diseases of the United States. A Reference Manual for Health Care Providers, 6th ed. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2022. Accessed December 23, 2025 https://www.cdc.gov/ticks/media/pdfs/2025/03/tickborne-diseases-manual-508.pdf?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/ticks/tickbornediseases/TickborneDiseases-P.pdf.
- Shapiro ED. Clinical practice: Lyme disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(18):1724-1731. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1314325
- Skar GL, Blum MA, Simonsen, KA. Lyme Disease In: StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Updated October 1, 2024. Accessed December 15, 2025 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK431066/.
- Suggested reporting language, interpretation and guidance for Lyme disease serologic test results (April 2024). Association of Public Health Laboratories. Updated April 2024. Accessed December 15, 2025. https://www.aphl.org/aboutAPHL/publications/Documents/ID-2024-Lyme-Disease-Serologic-Testing-Reporting.pdf
- Lantos PM, Rumbaugh J, Bockenstedt LK, et al. Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), American Academy of Neurology (AAN), and American College of Rheumatology (ACR): 2020 guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(1):e1-e48. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa1215
- Telford SR, Goethert HK, Molloy PJ, et al. Borrelia miyamotoi disease: neither Lyme disease nor relapsing fever. Clin Lab Med. 2015;35(4):867-882. doi:10.1016/j.cll.2015.08.002
- Hildenbrand P, Craven DE, Jones R, et al. Lyme neuroborreliosis: manifestations of a rapidly emerging zoonosis. Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30(6):1079-1087. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1579
- Steere AC. Treatment of Lyme arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2019;46(8):871-873. doi:10.3899/jrheum.190320
- Mead P, Petersen J, Hinckley A. Updated CDC recommendation for serologic diagnosis of Lyme disease. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(32):703. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6832a4
- B. burgdorferi IgG/IgM Test System. [Package insert]. ZEUS Scientific; 2020.
- Branda JA, Body BA, Boyle J, et al. Advances in serodiagnostic testing for Lyme disease are at hand. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;66(7):1133-1139. doi:10.1093/cid/cix943
- Kalish RA, McHugh G, Granquist J, et al. Persistence of immunoglobulin M or immunoglobulin G antibody responses to Borrelia burgdorferi 10–20 years after active Lyme disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(6):780-785. doi:10.1086/322669
- Nocton JJ, Bloom BJ, Rutledge BJ, et al. Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi DNA by polymerase chain reaction in cerebrospinal fluid in Lyme neuroborreliosis. J Infect Dis. 1996;174(3):623-627. doi:10.1093/infdis/174.3.623
- Blanc F, Jaulhac B, Fleury M, et al. Relevance of the antibody index to diagnose Lyme neuroborreliosis among seropositive patients. Neurology. 2007;69(10):953-958. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000269672.17807.e0
- Aguero-Rosenfeld ME, Wang G, Schwartz I, et al. Diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18(3):484-509. doi:10.1128/CMR.18.3.484-509.2005
- Sudhindra P, Wang G, Schriefer ME, et al. Insights into Borrelia miyamotoi infection from an untreated case demonstrating relapsing fever, monocytosis and a positive C6 Lyme serology. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;86(1):93-96. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.06.015
Content reviewed 1/2026
This Clinical Focus provides information about laboratory tests related to Lyme disease.
Clinical Focus
Lyme Disease
Laboratory Support of Diagnosis and Management
Clinical background [return to contents]
Lyme disease or Lyme borreliosis is by far the most common tick-borne disease in the United States. It is caused by the bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi and transmitted from the deer tick (Ixodes scapularis or Ixodes pacificus). In 2023, approximately 90,000 cases of Lyme disease were reported to the CDC by healthcare providers1 but, based on insurance claims data, the annual number of patients diagnosed and treated could be as high as 476,000 per year.2
Lyme disease cases are most frequently reported from the upper midwestern, northeastern, and Mid-Atlantic states.3 However, cases are also reported from Northern California, Oregon, and Washington. Lyme disease is most common among children and middle-aged adults.4
The clinical presentation of Lyme disease is categorized as 1 of 3 stages: early localized, early disseminated, and late (Table 1).3,5-7 In 70% to 80% of infected persons, early localized disease is characterized by erythema migrans (EM), a round skin lesion at least 4 cm to 5 cm in diameter that may appear in a “bulls-eye” pattern and expand up to 30 cm across.3 In the absence of EM, the differential diagnosis may include other tick-borne diseases such as hard tick relapsing fever (Borrelia miyamotoi disease), which is often misdiagnosed as Lyme disease owing to overlapping symptoms.8
Table 1. Lyme Disease: Stages, Symptoms, and Recommended Laboratory Testing [return to contents]
Stage of disease3,5 |
Symptom onset3 |
Symptoms3 |
Laboratory testing3,7 |
Early localized |
3-30 days after tick bite |
|
If EM is identified in a patient where Lyme disease is endemic, serologic testing is not recommended (ie, clinical diagnosis of Lyme is recommended) STTT or MTTT may be considered (weakly recommended) for patients with 1 or more skin lesions suggestive of but atypical for EM; however, serologic testing during the acute phase of infection is less sensitive and specific than testing at later stages of infection |
Early disseminated |
3-12 weeks after tick bite |
|
When assessing for possible LNB affecting either the PNS or CNS, STTT or MTTT, serum is recommended If LNB or 1 or more acute symptoms (eg, meningitis, painful radiculoneuritis) of LNB is suspected, guideline recommendations include obtaining simultaneous samples of CSF and serum for measuring CSF:serum antibody index STTT or MTTT is recommended when assessing for rheumatologic symptoms of Lyme disease; PCR is recommended in seropositive patients |
Late-stage |
Months to years after tick bite |
|
STTT or MTTT is recommended with IgG only considered >30 days after symptom onset |
| CNS, central nervous system; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; EM, erythema migrans; LNB, Lyme neuroborreliosis; MTTT, modified 2-tiered testing; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PNS, peripheral nervous system; STTT, standard 2-tiered testing. |
The first sign of early disseminated disease is often additional smaller skin lesions that may develop if Lyme disease is untreated; however, a recognized skin lesion does not always occur. Extracutaneous involvement in early disseminated disease can include cardiac, rheumatologic, and/or neurologic manifestations (Table 1).3,5-7 About 10% to 15% of patients with untreated Lyme disease will develop Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB).9 Lyme arthritis may also occur during late-stage disease and is the most common manifestation of Lyme disease months after initial tick exposure.10 Left untreated, Lyme arthritis usually affects the knees over a period of several years.10
If initiated in the early stages of Lyme disease, treatment with appropriate antibiotics is usually effective.7 Prophylaxis or serologic testing after a tick bite is usually not indicated in areas where less than 20% of ticks are infected; however, in areas where infected ticks are endemic, laboratory testing, including tick identification, is recommended.7
This Clinical Focus provides information on appropriate test selection and interpretation in patients with suspected Lyme disease. The information in the text and tables is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended as medical advice. Test selection and interpretation, diagnosis, and patient management decisions should be based on the physician’s education, clinical expertise, and assessment of the patient.
Individuals suitable for testing [return to contents]
- Symptomatic (Table 1) individuals with a history of exposure to a tick-endemic area
Test availability [return to contents]
Laboratory tests that can help confirm the clinical diagnosis of Lyme disease include tick identification, various serologic techniques and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays (Table 2). Panel components may be ordered individually.
Table 2. Tests Available for Diagnosis and Management of Lyme Disease [return to contents]
Test code |
Assaya |
Method |
Clinical use |
Borrelia burgdorferi DNA, Qualitative Real-Time PCR, Miscellaneousb,c |
Real-time PCR |
Diagnose Lyme disease using whole blood, synovial fluid, or CSF |
|
Borrelia miyamotoi Antibody (IgG, IgM), Immunoassayb |
Immunoassay |
Differentially diagnose B miyamotoi disease vs Lyme disease |
|
Borrelia miyamotoi DNA, Qualitative Real-Time PCR, Miscellaneousb |
Real-time PCR |
Confirm diagnosis of B miyamotoi disease |
|
Borrelia Species DNA, Qualitative Real-Time PCR, Miscellaneousb |
Real-time PCR |
Detect Borrelia spp DNA in whole blood, synovial fluid, or CSF |
|
Borrelia Species DNA, Qualitative Real-Time PCR, Tickb |
Real-time PCR |
Detect B burgdorferi in tick to assess risk of Lyme disease |
|
Borrelia Species DNA, Real-Time PCR, With Reflexes, Bloodc,d |
Real-time PCR |
Detect Borrelia spp DNA; diagnose Lyme disease or B miyamotoi disease in whole blood |
|
Borrelia Species DNA, Real-Time PCR, With Reflexes, Synovial Fluid/CSFc,d |
Real-time PCR |
Detect Borrelia spp DNA; diagnose Lyme disease or B miyamotoi disease in synovial fluid or CSF |
|
Lyme Disease Ab With Reflex to Blot (IgG, IgM)d |
Immunoassay |
Diagnose Lyme disease by standard 2-tiered test |
|
Lyme Disease Antibody With Reflex to Immunoassay (IgG, IgM) (MTTT)d Includes reflex to Lyme disease supplemental antibodies (IgG, IgM) if Lyme disease antibody is positive or equivocal. |
Immunoassay |
Diagnose Lyme disease by modified 2-tiered test |
|
Lyme Disease Antibody Index for CNS Infection |
ELISA; Nephelometry |
Diagnose Lyme neuroborreliosis |
|
Lyme Disease Antibodies (IgG, IgM), Immunoblot |
Immunoblot |
Diagnose Lyme disease when ELISA results are positive or equivocal |
|
Lyme Disease Antibody (IgG), Immunoblot |
|||
Tick-borne Disease, Acute Molecular Panel Includes Anaplasma phagocytophilum (17320), Babesia microti (37314), Borrelia miyamotoi (93795), Ehrlichia chaffeensis (11353), and Lyme disease Borrelia spp (15777). |
Real-time PCR |
Diagnose tick-borne diseases when selecting tests for individual pathogens is challenging owing to overlapping geographic distributions and clinical presentations of illness; especially useful to diagnose mixed infections |
|
Tick-borne Disease, Antibody Panel With Reflexesb,d Includes Lyme disease Ab with reflex to immunoassay (IgG, IgM, 39733) and A phagocytophilum antibodies (IgG and IgM, 16189); B microti antibodies (IgG and IgM, 16194); and E chaffeensis (IgG and IgM, 16197) with reflexes to titers. |
IFA |
Diagnose tick-borne diseases when selecting tests for individual pathogens is challenging owing to substantial clinical overlap and coinfection |
|
Tick ID With Reflex to Lyme Disease DNA, Real-Time PCR, Tickd |
Microscopy; reflex to PCR |
Identify tick and B burgdorferi to assess risk of tick-borne disease and assist with differential diagnosis |
| CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; IFA, immunofluorescence assay; PCR, polymerase chain reaction. | |
| a | Panel components may be ordered individually. |
| b | This test was developed and its analytical performance characteristics have been determined by Quest Diagnostics. It has not been cleared or approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. This assay has been validated pursuant to the CLIA regulations and is used for clinical purposes. |
| c | Please refer to the Quest Test Directory for your service area for test availability. TestDirectory.QuestDiagnostics.com/Test/Home |
| d | Reflex tests are performed at an additional charge and are associated with an additional CPT® code(s). |
Test selection and interpretation [return to contents]
A timeline of tick exposure in a tick-endemic area and symptoms of Lyme disease guide appropriate test selection (Table 1).3,5-7 Guideline recommendations include testing for IgM and/or IgG antibodies using either standard 2-tiered testing (STTT, test code 6646) or modified 2-tiered testing (MTTT, test code 39733)6,7,11; in MTTT, second-tier testing is performed by a second enzyme immunoassay instead of a Western blot. MTTT detects up to 30% more cases compared to STTT in patients with early Lyme disease.12,13 The sections below outline appropriate test selection based on the stage of disease along with characteristic test results.
Early localized Lyme disease
Diagnosis of early localized Lyme disease can sometimes be made on the basis of EM alone without laboratory testing.3 Importantly, serologic testing during the acute phase of Lyme disease is less sensitive than at later stages of disease.6 When testing is done too soon (≤14 days) following infection, negative or equivocal results may occur due to the time needed for the immune system to develop a serologic response.6 Positive or repeat testing (test codes 29477, 8593) on another sample collected in 7 to 14 days is recommened.6 Serologic testing (MTTT or STTT) may also be considered in patients with 1 or more skin lesions suggestive of, but atypical for, EM.7
If first-tier testing performed 14 days after suspected infection is negative, then second-tier testing is not required.6 If first-tier testing is positive or equivocal, then second-tier testing is required.6 For samples collected from patients with symptoms lasting 30 days or less, positive IgM is consistent with infection regardless of IgG seropositivity.6
Early disseminated Lyme disease
Two-tiered testing is recommended when clinical findings are suggestive of early disseminated Lyme disease (Table 1).3,5-7 For specimens collected at 2 to 4 weeks after onset of symptoms, 2-tiered testing that is positive for IgM and negative for IgG indicates early infection, unless obtained on a specimen collected more than 1 month after onset of symptoms.6 If the specimen was collected more than 1 month after onset of symptoms, a positive IgM finding is more likely to represent a false-positive result unless IgG is also positive; vaccination or other diseases may also cause false-positive results.6 A positive IgG result by 2-tiered testing is required to confirm the diagnosis of early disseminated Lyme disease but it does not differentiate between active and past B burgdorferi infection.3,14
A diagnosis of LNB involving either the peripheral nervous system or central nervous system (CNS) can be supported if Borrelia antibody or DNA are detected in serum or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF); however, serum antibody testing is recommended over PCR due to low clinical sensitivity (38%).7,15 If LNB involving the CNS is suspected and CSF testing is performed, a validated laboratory method for the determination of the CSF:serum antibody index using simultaneously obtained CSF and serum samples is recommended.7 The antibody levels in the CSF that are compared to control levels (ie, serum antibody or albumin) in the CSF:serum antibody index can be measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or nephelometry (test code 34194); an elevated antibody index strongly supports a diagnosis of LNB.16
Negative serology results may indicate lack of infection or lack of seroconversion, which may occur if samples are collected too early after disease onset or when early antibiotic therapy blunts the antibody response.6 PCR-based assays (test codes 94322, 39209, 15777, 39219, 39218, 15510, 90558) can be useful in the workup of B burgdorferi infection if seroconversion has not yet occurred; these assays, however, are limited by low clinical sensitivity (18%).17 Untreated patients who continue to be symptomatic for months or years but are IgG-negative are unlikely to have Lyme disease, and a differential diagnosis should be considered.7
Late-stage Lyme disease
In patients with suspected Lyme disease that has been left untreated for months to years after a tick bite, symptoms that are characteristic of late-stage disease such as Lyme arthritis or Lyme LNB can help guide diagnostic test selection. Detection of Borrelia DNA in synovial fluid, commonly from the knees, supports the diagnosis of Lyme arthritis (sensitivity, 78%; specificity, 100%).10,17
Differential diagnosis
In addition to clinical presentation and microscopy, hard-tick relapsing fever (Borrelia miyamotoi disease) (HTRF [BMD]) can be distinguished from Lyme disease by serology (test code 39684) and molecular testing.3 Negative serology results do not rule out HTRF (BMD) infection and may be due to testing prior to seroconversion during the acute phase of infection.18 PCR amplification of B miyamotoi DNA (test code 93795) is part of an acute molecular panel of tests (94322) used to confirm a presumptive diagnosis of HTRF (BMD).
See Tick-borne Diseases: Laboratory Support of Diagnosis and Management for more details on HTRF (BMD) and information on differential diagnoses of other tick-borne diseases.
References [return to contents]
- Lyme disease surveillance data. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated February 11, 2025. Accessed December 15, 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/data-research/facts-stats/surveillance-data-1.html
- Kugeler KJ, Schwartz AM, Delorey MJ, et al. Estimating the frequency of Lyme disease diagnoses, United States, 2010-2018. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021;27(2):616-619. doi:10.3201/eid2702.202731
- Tickborne diseases of the United States. A Reference Manual for Health Care Providers, 6th ed. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2022. Accessed December 23, 2025 https://www.cdc.gov/ticks/media/pdfs/2025/03/tickborne-diseases-manual-508.pdf?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/ticks/tickbornediseases/TickborneDiseases-P.pdf.
- Shapiro ED. Clinical practice: Lyme disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(18):1724-1731. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1314325
- Skar GL, Blum MA, Simonsen, KA. Lyme Disease In: StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Updated October 1, 2024. Accessed December 15, 2025 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK431066/.
- Suggested reporting language, interpretation and guidance for Lyme disease serologic test results (April 2024). Association of Public Health Laboratories. Updated April 2024. Accessed December 15, 2025. https://www.aphl.org/aboutAPHL/publications/Documents/ID-2024-Lyme-Disease-Serologic-Testing-Reporting.pdf
- Lantos PM, Rumbaugh J, Bockenstedt LK, et al. Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), American Academy of Neurology (AAN), and American College of Rheumatology (ACR): 2020 guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(1):e1-e48. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa1215
- Telford SR, Goethert HK, Molloy PJ, et al. Borrelia miyamotoi disease: neither Lyme disease nor relapsing fever. Clin Lab Med. 2015;35(4):867-882. doi:10.1016/j.cll.2015.08.002
- Hildenbrand P, Craven DE, Jones R, et al. Lyme neuroborreliosis: manifestations of a rapidly emerging zoonosis. Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30(6):1079-1087. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1579
- Steere AC. Treatment of Lyme arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2019;46(8):871-873. doi:10.3899/jrheum.190320
- Mead P, Petersen J, Hinckley A. Updated CDC recommendation for serologic diagnosis of Lyme disease. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(32):703. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6832a4
- B. burgdorferi IgG/IgM Test System. [Package insert]. ZEUS Scientific; 2020.
- Branda JA, Body BA, Boyle J, et al. Advances in serodiagnostic testing for Lyme disease are at hand. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;66(7):1133-1139. doi:10.1093/cid/cix943
- Kalish RA, McHugh G, Granquist J, et al. Persistence of immunoglobulin M or immunoglobulin G antibody responses to Borrelia burgdorferi 10–20 years after active Lyme disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(6):780-785. doi:10.1086/322669
- Nocton JJ, Bloom BJ, Rutledge BJ, et al. Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi DNA by polymerase chain reaction in cerebrospinal fluid in Lyme neuroborreliosis. J Infect Dis. 1996;174(3):623-627. doi:10.1093/infdis/174.3.623
- Blanc F, Jaulhac B, Fleury M, et al. Relevance of the antibody index to diagnose Lyme neuroborreliosis among seropositive patients. Neurology. 2007;69(10):953-958. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000269672.17807.e0
- Aguero-Rosenfeld ME, Wang G, Schwartz I, et al. Diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18(3):484-509. doi:10.1128/CMR.18.3.484-509.2005
- Sudhindra P, Wang G, Schriefer ME, et al. Insights into Borrelia miyamotoi infection from an untreated case demonstrating relapsing fever, monocytosis and a positive C6 Lyme serology. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;86(1):93-96. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.06.015
Content reviewed 1/2026